1996 • Ford
Maverick
Ford Maverick 2.7 TD (5 dr) 1996Overall Score48.5/100
1996 Ford Maverick vs 1996 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.8d (100 Hp) 1996Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Cedric
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
48.5–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MaverickSpecificationNissan Cedric
FordMakeNissan
MaverickModelCedric
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford MaverickSpecificationNissan Cedric
19,9 s0–100 km/h17,3 s
145 km/hTop speed163 km/h
2663 ccEngine displacement2825 cc
100 HPPower100 HP
221 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MaverickSpecificationNissan Cedric
DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,1 ltAverage consumption12,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MaverickSpecificationNissan Cedric
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/80 R15 RTyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford MaverickSpecificationNissan Cedric
4585 mmLength—
1735 mmWidth—
1810 mmHeight—
1850 KgWeight1560 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Ford Maverick and 1996 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…