DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Dodge Charger vs 2010 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeFord
ChargerModelKuga
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,2 s
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2523 cc
181 HPPower200 HP
258 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank58 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
9,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
215/65 R17Tyre size235/55 R17H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5082 mmLength4443 mm
1891 mmWidth1832 mm
1479 mmHeight1677 mm
1695 KgWeight1573 Kg
3048 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Dodge Charger and 2010 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…