DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Ford Kuga vs 2010 Dodge Charger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeDodge
KugaModelCharger
2010Model year2010
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2523 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
200 HPPower181 HP
320 NmTorque258 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9,0 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
235/55 R17HTyre size215/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4443 mmLength5082 mm
1832 mmWidth1891 mm
1677 mmHeight1479 mm
1573 KgWeight1695 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase3048 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Ford Kuga and 2010 Dodge Charger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…