DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Nissan Altima vs 2009 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Altima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
AltimaModelKuga
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,2 s
235 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2523 cc
177 HPPower200 HP
244 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank58 lt
—Urban consumption13,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/55 R17Tyre size235/55 R17H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4821 mmLength4443 mm
1796 mmWidth1832 mm
1471 mmHeight1677 mm
—Weight1573 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Nissan Altima and 2009 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Altima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…