2013 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost (182 Hp) 2013Overall Score51.25/100
2013 Ford Kuga vs 2015 Renault Kadjar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Renault
Kadjar
Renault Kadjar Icon 2015 1.5 dCi 110 HPOverall Score67.25/100
WINNER
Renault Kadjar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 16 points.
51.25–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford KugaSpecificationRenault Kadjar
FordMakeRenault
KugaModelKadjar
2013Model year2015
SUVBody typeCrossover
5Seats—
5Doors—
Performance
Ford KugaSpecificationRenault Kadjar
9,7 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
200 km/hTop speed181 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
182 HPPower110 HP
0 NmTorque250 Nm
—Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford KugaSpecificationRenault Kadjar
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption3,8 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford KugaSpecificationRenault Kadjar
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—TransmissionEDC
—Tyre size17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford KugaSpecificationRenault Kadjar
4443 mmLength4449 mm
1842 mmWidth1836 mm
1710 mmHeight1607 mm
1682 KgWeight1407 kg
—Luggage capacity472 lt
2690 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Ford Kuga and 2015 Renault Kadjar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Kadjar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 16 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…