DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Ford C-Max vs 2013 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford C-MaxSpecificationFord Kuga
FordMakeFord
C-MaxModelKuga
2015Model year2013
MPVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Ford C-MaxSpecificationFord Kuga
11,3 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
184 km/hTop speed200 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
115 HPPower182 HP
270 NmTorque0 Nm

Fuel & Consumption

Ford C-MaxSpecificationFord Kuga
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford C-MaxSpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford C-MaxSpecificationFord Kuga
4380 mmLength4443 mm
1828 mmWidth1842 mm
1626 mmHeight1710 mm
1390 KgWeight1682 Kg
—Wheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Ford C-Max and 2013 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…