DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Ford Kuga vs 2013 Nissan Qashqai Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
KugaModelQashqai
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSUV, Crossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
195 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
150 HPPower130 HP
240 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19Tyre size215/60 R17; 215/55 R18; 225/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4524 mmLength4377 mm
1838 mmWidth1806 mm
1702 mmHeight1590 mm
1580 KgWeight1365-1499 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2646 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Ford Kuga and 2013 Nissan Qashqai approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…