DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Citroen C4 vs 2013 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C4SpecificationFord Kuga
CitroenMakeFord
C4ModelKuga
2013Model year2013
Minivan, MPVBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Citroen C4SpecificationFord Kuga
10,4 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
204 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
156 HPPower150 HP
240 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C4SpecificationFord Kuga
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
7,.0 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C4SpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 EGSGears6
215/50 R17Tyre size235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C4SpecificationFord Kuga
4590 mmLength4524 mm
1830 mmWidth1838 mm
1660-1710 mmHeight1702 mm
1517 KgWeight1580 Kg
2728 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Citroen C4 and 2013 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…