DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Kuga vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 11 points.

67.5–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo S40
FordMakeVolvo
KugaModelS40
2016Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo S40
10,1 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
182 HPPower115 HP
240 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank52 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption4,3 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo S40
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/50 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo S40
4531 mmLength4476 mm
1838 mmWidth1770 mm
1703 mmHeight1454 mm
1686 KgWeight1372 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Kuga and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 11 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…