2016 • Skoda
Yeti
Skoda Yeti 1.4 TSI (150 Hp) 2016Overall Score68.25/100
2016 Skoda Yeti vs 2016 Ford Kuga Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBoost (182 Hp) 2016Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Yeti
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Skoda YetiSpecificationFord Kuga
SkodaMakeFord
YetiModelKuga
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Skoda YetiSpecificationFord Kuga
8,7 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1395 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
150 HPPower182 HP
250 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Skoda YetiSpecificationFord Kuga
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Skoda YetiSpecificationFord Kuga
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/60 R16; 225/50 R17Tyre size235/50 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Skoda YetiSpecificationFord Kuga
4222 mmLength4531 mm
1793 mmWidth1838 mm
1691 mmHeight1703 mm
1396 KgWeight1686 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2690 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Skoda Yeti and 2016 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Yeti leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…