2016 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBoost (182 Hp) 2016Overall Score67.5/100
2016 Ford Kuga vs 2016 Skoda Yeti Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Skoda
Yeti
Skoda Yeti 1.4 TSI (150 Hp) 2016Overall Score68.25/100
WINNER
Skoda Yeti
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford KugaSpecificationSkoda Yeti
FordMakeSkoda
KugaModelYeti
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford KugaSpecificationSkoda Yeti
10,1 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1395 cc
182 HPPower150 HP
240 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford KugaSpecificationSkoda Yeti
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford KugaSpecificationSkoda Yeti
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/50 R18Tyre size215/60 R16; 225/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford KugaSpecificationSkoda Yeti
4531 mmLength4222 mm
1838 mmWidth1793 mm
1703 mmHeight1691 mm
1686 KgWeight1396 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2578 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Kuga and 2016 Skoda Yeti approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Yeti leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…