DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Clio vs 2016 Ford KA Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Renault ClioSpecificationFord KA
RenaultMakeFord
ClioModelKA
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Renault ClioSpecificationFord KA
11,19 s0–100 km/h—
194 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
110 HPPower110 HP
260 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Renault ClioSpecificationFord KA
DieselFuel typePetrol / Ethanol – E85
0 ltFuel tank51 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Renault ClioSpecificationFord KA
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
185/65 R15; 195/55 R16; 205/45 R17Tyre size175/65 R14; 195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Renault ClioSpecificationFord KA
4062 mmLength4254 mm
1731 mmWidth1695 mm
1448 mmHeight1460 mm
1204-1205 KgWeight1032 Kg
2589 mmWheelbase2491 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Clio and 2016 Ford KA approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…