DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford KA vs 2016 Citroen C4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KASpecificationCitroen C4
FordMakeCitroen
KAModelC4
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Ford KASpecificationCitroen C4
—0–100 km/h11,4 s
0 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
110 HPPower114 HP
146 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KASpecificationCitroen C4
Petrol / Ethanol – E85Fuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption5,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KASpecificationCitroen C4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/65 R14; 195/55 R15Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KASpecificationCitroen C4
4254 mmLength4644 mm
1695 mmWidth1789 mm
1460 mmHeight1513-1518 mm
1032 KgWeight1357 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2708 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford KA and 2016 Citroen C4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…