DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford KA vs 2000 Renault Kangoo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Kangoo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
KAModelKangoo
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats2
3Doors3

Performance

15,4 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
155 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1149 cc
60 HPPower75 HP
105 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption9 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R14 T
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3620 mmLength3995 mm
1639 mmWidth1663 mm
1383 mmHeight1827 mm
890 KgWeight1065 Kg
2448 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford KA and 2000 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Kangoo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…