1995 • Zastava
128 Skala
Zastava 128 Skala 1.3 (65 Hp) 1995Overall Score42.5/100
1995 Zastava 128 Skala vs 1996 Ford KA Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Ford
KA
Ford KA 1.3 i (60 Hp) 1996Overall Score42.25/100
WINNER
Zastava 128 Skala
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Zastava 128 SkalaSpecificationFord KA
ZastavaMakeFord
128 SkalaModelKA
1995Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Zastava 128 SkalaSpecificationFord KA
14,2 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
140 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1302 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
65 HPPower60 HP
98 NmTorque105 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Zastava 128 SkalaSpecificationFord KA
PetrolFuel typePetrol
36 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Urban consumption8,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Zastava 128 SkalaSpecificationFord KA
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/80 R13Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABS—
Dimensions
Zastava 128 SkalaSpecificationFord KA
3840 mmLength3620 mm
1590 mmWidth1639 mm
1350 mmHeight1383 mm
840 KgWeight890 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2448 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Zastava 128 Skala and 1996 Ford KA approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Zastava 128 Skala leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…