DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford KA vs 1996 Renault Twingo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Twingo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
KAModelTwingo
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
3Doors3

Performance

15,4 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
155 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1149 cc
60 HPPower55 HP
105 NmTorque93 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank40 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size145/70 R13
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3620 mmLength3433 mm
1639 mmWidth1630 mm
1383 mmHeight1423 mm
890 KgWeight890 Kg
2448 mmWheelbase2340 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford KA and 1996 Renault Twingo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Twingo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…