2004 • Ford
GT
Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V (507 Hp) 2004Overall Score88.5/100
2004 Ford GT vs 1999 Callaway C12 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Callaway
C12
Callaway C12 5.7 i V8 (440 Hp) 1999Overall Score87.5/100
WINNER
Ford GT
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
88.5–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford GTSpecificationCallaway C12
FordMakeCallaway
GTModelC12
2004Model year1999
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
2Seats2
2Doors2
Performance
Ford GTSpecificationCallaway C12
3,8 s0–100 km/h4,3 s
322 km/hTop speed304 km/h
5409 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
507 HPPower440 HP
678 NmTorque520 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Ford GTSpecificationCallaway C12
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank72 lt
30 ltUrban consumption16 lt
14 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford GTSpecificationCallaway C12
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/45 ZR18; 315/40 ZR19Tyre size295/30 R19; 335/25 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford GTSpecificationCallaway C12
4645 mmLength4850 mm
1955 mmWidth2000 mm
1125 mmHeight1200 mm
1450 KgWeight1480 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Ford GT and 1999 Callaway C12 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford GT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…