DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Callaway C12 vs 2004 Ford GT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford GT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

87.5–88.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Callaway C12SpecificationFord GT
CallawayMakeFord
C12ModelGT
1999Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

Callaway C12SpecificationFord GT
4,3 s0–100 km/h3,8 s
304 km/hTop speed322 km/h
5665 ccEngine displacement5409 cc
440 HPPower507 HP
520 NmTorque678 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Callaway C12SpecificationFord GT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank66 lt
16 ltUrban consumption30 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption14 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Callaway C12SpecificationFord GT
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
295/30 R19; 335/25 R19Tyre size235/45 ZR18; 315/40 ZR19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Callaway C12SpecificationFord GT
4850 mmLength4645 mm
2000 mmWidth1955 mm
1200 mmHeight1125 mm
1480 KgWeight1450 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Callaway C12 and 2004 Ford GT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford GT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…