2004 • Ford
GT
Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V (507 Hp) 2004Overall Score88.5/100
2004 Ford GT vs 2005 Volvo XC90 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Volvo
XC90
Volvo XC90 2.5 20V (210 Hp) 2005Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Ford GT
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 14.75 points.
88.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford GTSpecificationVolvo XC90
FordMakeVolvo
GTModelXC90
2004Model year2005
CoupeBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Ford GTSpecificationVolvo XC90
3,8 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
322 km/hTop speed210 km/h
5409 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
507 HPPower210 HP
678 NmTorque320 Nm
8Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Ford GTSpecificationVolvo XC90
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank72 lt
30 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
14 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford GTSpecificationVolvo XC90
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
235/45 ZR18; 315/40 ZR19Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford GTSpecificationVolvo XC90
4645 mmLength4800 mm
1955 mmWidth1890 mm
1125 mmHeight1740 mm
1450 KgWeight1985 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2860 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Ford GT and 2005 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford GT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 14.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…