2006 • Ford
Galaxy
Ford Galaxy 2.3 16V (145 Hp) 2006Overall Score60.25/100
2006 Ford Galaxy vs 2006 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 CVVT (144 Hp) 2006Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Ford Galaxy
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford GalaxySpecificationKia Optima
FordMakeKia
GalaxyModelOptima
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford GalaxySpecificationKia Optima
12,7 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
191 km/hTop speed208 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
145 HPPower144 HP
203 NmTorque188 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford GalaxySpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank62 lt
14 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
10,1 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford GalaxySpecificationKia Optima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford GalaxySpecificationKia Optima
4641 mmLength4735 mm
1810 mmWidth1805 mm
1732 mmHeight1480 mm
1610 KgWeight1408 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2720 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Ford Galaxy and 2006 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…