DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Galaxy vs 2000 Mazda Xedos 9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Galaxy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMazda
GalaxyModelXedos 9
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,7 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
191 km/hTop speed202 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
145 HPPower143 HP
203 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
14 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
10,1 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size205/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4641 mmLength4825 mm
1810 mmWidth1770 mm
1732 mmHeight1395 mm
1610 KgWeight1410 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Galaxy and 2000 Mazda Xedos 9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…