DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Galaxy vs 2000 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Xsara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeCitroen
GalaxyModelXsara
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

17,1 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
160 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1905 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
210 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank54 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4641 mmLength4167 mm
1810 mmWidth1700 mm
1732 mmHeight1400 mm
1670 KgWeight1127 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Galaxy and 2000 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…