2000 • Ford
Galaxy
Ford Galaxy 1.9 TDI (110 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Ford Galaxy vs 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.8 (116 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Ford Galaxy
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford GalaxySpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
FordMakeMitsubishi
GalaxyModelCarisma
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford GalaxySpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
14,7 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
172 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
110 HPPower116 HP
235 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford GalaxySpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford GalaxySpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford GalaxySpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4641 mmLength4435 mm
1810 mmWidth1710 mm
1730 mmHeight1405 mm
1640 KgWeight1130 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Galaxy and 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…