DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Ford Focus vs 2009 Nissan Cima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

85.5–84.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
FocusModelCima
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

5,9 s0–100 km/h—
263 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2522 ccEngine displacement2988 cc
305 HPPower280 HP
440 NmTorque387 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,4 ltUrban consumption—
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/35 R19Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4402 mmLength4970 mm
1842 mmWidth1820 mm
1497 mmHeight1450 mm
1468 KgWeight1670 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Ford Focus and 2009 Nissan Cima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…