DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Nissan Cima vs 2009 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.75–85.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
CimaModelFocus
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,9 s
230 km/hTop speed263 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement2522 cc
280 HPPower305 HP
387 NmTorque440 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption13,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,0 lt
11 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size235/35 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4970 mmLength4402 mm
1820 mmWidth1842 mm
1450 mmHeight1497 mm
1670 KgWeight1468 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Nissan Cima and 2009 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…