DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Focus vs 2003 Rover 45 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford FocusSpecificationRover 45
FordMakeRover
FocusModel45
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Ford FocusSpecificationRover 45
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
180 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
131 HPPower150 HP
183 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Ford FocusSpecificationRover 45
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption14 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford FocusSpecificationRover 45
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size205/45 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford FocusSpecificationRover 45
4526 mmLength4517 mm
1699 mmWidth1696 mm
1448 mmHeight1394 mm
1275 KgWeight1340 Kg
2616 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Focus and 2003 Rover 45 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…