2000 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 2.0 i 16V ZX3 (131 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Ford Focus vs 2000 Citroen XM Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Citroen
XM
Citroen XM 2.0 i 16V (132 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FocusSpecificationCitroen XM
FordMakeCitroen
FocusModelXM
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Ford FocusSpecificationCitroen XM
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
180 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
131 HPPower132 HP
183 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FocusSpecificationCitroen XM
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank80 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FocusSpecificationCitroen XM
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FocusSpecificationCitroen XM
4270 mmLength4708 mm
1699 mmWidth1794 mm
1430 mmHeight1394 mm
1200 KgWeight1395 Kg
2616 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Focus and 2000 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…