DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen XM vs 2000 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeFord
XMModelFocus
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
205 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
132 HPPower131 HP
180 NmTorque183 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank50 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4708 mmLength4270 mm
1794 mmWidth1699 mm
1394 mmHeight1430 mm
1395 KgWeight1200 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2616 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen XM and 2000 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…