DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Focus vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford FocusSpecificationMG ZR
FordMakeMG
FocusModelZR
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

Ford FocusSpecificationMG ZR
9,2 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
201 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
130 HPPower113 HP
173 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford FocusSpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford FocusSpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford FocusSpecificationMG ZR
4178 mmLength4011 mm
1702 mmWidth1690 mm
1481 mmHeight1400 mm
1146 KgWeight1155 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Focus and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…