DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Focus vs 2006 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

51.25–48.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
FocusModelFocus
2003Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
3/5Doors2

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement0 cc
100 HPPower100 HP
143 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4152 mmLength—
1698 mmWidth—
1430 mmHeight—
1070 KgWeight—
2615 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Focus and 2006 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…