2003 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2003Overall Score50.25/100
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2003 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.6 16V (100 Hp) 2003Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFord Focus
MitsubishiMakeFord
LancerModelFocus
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFord Focus
12,6 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
181 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
98 HPPower100 HP
150 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi LancerSpecificationFord Focus
4485 mmLength4152 mm
1695 mmWidth1698 mm
1480 mmHeight1430 mm
1360 KgWeight1070 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2615 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2003 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…