2000 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.6 16V (100 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
2000 Ford Focus vs 2000 Volkswagen Polo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.8 (97 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FocusSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
FordMakeVolkswagen
FocusModelPolo
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Ford FocusSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
11,2 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
185 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
100 HPPower97 HP
143 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FocusSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FocusSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FocusSpecificationVolkswagen Polo
4152 mmLength4164 mm
1698 mmWidth1640 mm
1430 mmHeight1414 mm
1070 KgWeight1100 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2441 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Focus and 2000 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…