DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Focus vs 2000 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

51.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
FocusModelClio
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
185 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower107 HP
143 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4152 mmLength3773 mm
1698 mmWidth1640 mm
1430 mmHeight1417 mm
1070 KgWeight995 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Focus and 2000 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…