DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Focus vs 2003 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
RESULT

Tie

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.

51.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
FocusModelFocus
2000Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
185 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
100 HPPower100 HP
143 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
8 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4152 mmLength4152 mm
1698 mmWidth1698 mm
1430 mmHeight1430 mm
1070 KgWeight1070 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Focus and 2003 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…