DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Flex vs 2014 Dodge Charger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeDodge
FlexModelCharger
2016Model year2014
SUVBody typeSedan
6-7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3604 cc
286 HPPower296 HP
343 NmTorque353 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank72 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/60 R17Tyre size215/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5130 mmLength5077 mm
1930 mmWidth1905 mm
1727 mmHeight1482 mm
—Weight1797 Kg
2995 mmWheelbase3052 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Flex and 2014 Dodge Charger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…