DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Dodge Charger vs 2016 Ford Flex Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

83.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DodgeMakeFord
ChargerModelFlex
2014Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats6-7
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
3604 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
296 HPPower286 HP
353 NmTorque343 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank71 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/65 R17Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5077 mmLength5130 mm
1905 mmWidth1930 mm
1482 mmHeight1727 mm
1797 KgWeight—
3052 mmWheelbase2995 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Dodge Charger and 2016 Ford Flex approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…