DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Ford Flex vs 2016 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

82.5–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
FlexModelExplorer
2014Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
6-7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,4 s
185 km/hTop speed193 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3497 cc
286 HPPower340 HP
343 NmTorque485 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6 SelectShift
235/60 R17Tyre size255/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5130 mmLength5019 mm
1930 mmWidth1988 mm
1727 mmHeight1788 mm
2995 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Ford Flex and 2016 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…