DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Explorer vs 2014 Ford Flex Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.5–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
ExplorerModelFlex
2016Model year2014
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats6-7
5Doors5

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed185 km/h
3497 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
340 HPPower286 HP
485 NmTorque343 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank71 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
10,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 SelectShiftGears6
255/50 R20Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5019 mmLength5130 mm
1988 mmWidth1930 mm
1788 mmHeight1727 mm
2860 mmWheelbase2995 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Explorer and 2014 Ford Flex approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…