DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Ford Flex vs 2004 Lincoln LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford FlexSpecificationLincoln LS
FordMakeLincoln
FlexModelLS
2009Model year2004
SUVBody typeSedan
6-7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Ford FlexSpecificationLincoln LS
185 km/hTop speed230 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
262 HPPower284 HP
336 NmTorque388 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Ford FlexSpecificationLincoln LS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption16 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
12,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Ford FlexSpecificationLincoln LS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/60 R17Tyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford FlexSpecificationLincoln LS
5130 mmLength4925 mm
2032 mmWidth1860 mm
1727 mmHeight1450 mm
—Weight1710 Kg
2995 mmWheelbase2910 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Ford Flex and 2004 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…