DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Lincoln LS vs 2009 Ford Flex Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lincoln LSSpecificationFord Flex
LincolnMakeFord
LSModelFlex
2004Model year2009
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats6-7
4Doors5

Performance

Lincoln LSSpecificationFord Flex
230 km/hTop speed185 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
284 HPPower262 HP
388 NmTorque336 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Lincoln LSSpecificationFord Flex
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank71 lt
16 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
—Average consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lincoln LSSpecificationFord Flex
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/50 R17Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Lincoln LSSpecificationFord Flex
4925 mmLength5130 mm
1860 mmWidth2032 mm
1450 mmHeight1727 mm
1710 KgWeight—
2910 mmWheelbase2995 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Lincoln LS and 2009 Ford Flex approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…