DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Ford Figo vs 2017 Opel Cascada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeOpel
FigoModelCascada
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1362 cc
112 HPPower120 HP
136 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption8,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4696 mm
1695 mmWidth1839 mm
1525 mmHeight1443 mm
—Weight1701-1816 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2695 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Ford Figo and 2017 Opel Cascada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…