DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Figo vs 2016 Skoda Octavia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Figo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeSkoda
FigoModelOctavia
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower90 HP
215 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption5,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,5 lt
—Average consumption4,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4659 mm
1695 mmWidth1814 mm
1525 mmHeight1461 mm
—Weight1300 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2686 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Figo and 2016 Skoda Octavia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Figo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…