DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 DS 3 vs 2016 Ford Figo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Figo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DS 3SpecificationFord Figo
DSMakeFord
3ModelFigo
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

DS 3SpecificationFord Figo
12,1 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
100 HPPower100 HP
254 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DS 3SpecificationFord Figo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
46 ltFuel tank40 lt
4,0 ltUrban consumption—
3,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

DS 3SpecificationFord Figo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R16; 205/45 R17Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

DS 3SpecificationFord Figo
3954 mmLength3995 mm
—Width1695 mm
1458-1483 mmHeight1525 mm
1148-1220 KgWeight—
2464 mmWheelbase2491 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 DS 3 and 2016 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Figo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…