DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Figo vs 2016 Renault Symbol Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Figo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
FigoModelSymbol
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h14,5 s
0 km/hTop speed156 km/h
1196 ccEngine displacement1149 cc
88 HPPower75 HP
112 NmTorque107 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,0 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
175/65 R14Tyre size15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4348 mm
1695 mmWidth1733 mm
1525 mmHeight1517 mm
—Weight974 kg
—Luggage capacity510 lt
2491 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Ford Figo

No additional feature records are available.

Renault SymbolDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Figo and 2016 Renault Symbol approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Figo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…