2016 • Ford
Figo
Ford Figo 1.2 Ti-VCT (88 Hp) 2016Overall Score57.5/100
2016 Ford Figo vs 2016 Nissan Micra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Nissan
Micra
Nissan Micra Street 2016 1.2 80 HPOverall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Ford Figo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FigoSpecificationNissan Micra
FordMakeNissan
FigoModelMicra
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford FigoSpecificationNissan Micra
—0–100 km/h13,7 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1196 ccEngine displacement1198 cc
88 HPPower80 HP
112 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FigoSpecificationNissan Micra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank41 lt
—Urban consumption6,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FigoSpecificationNissan Micra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
—TransmissionCVT
175/65 R14Tyre size14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FigoSpecificationNissan Micra
3995 mmLength3825 mm
1695 mmWidth1665 mm
1525 mmHeight1510 mm
—Weight945 kg
—Luggage capacity265 lt
2491 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Figo and 2016 Nissan Micra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Figo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…