2016 • Ford
Figo
Ford Figo 1.2 Ti-VCT (88 Hp) 2016Overall Score57.5/100
2016 Ford Figo vs 2016 Mitsubishi Space Star Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Mitsubishi
Space Star
Mitsubishi Space Star Intense 2016 1.2 80 HPOverall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Ford Figo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FigoSpecificationMitsubishi Space Star
FordMakeMitsubishi
FigoModelSpace Star
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford FigoSpecificationMitsubishi Space Star
—0–100 km/h12,8 s
0 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1196 ccEngine displacement1193 cc
88 HPPower80 HP
112 NmTorque106 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FigoSpecificationMitsubishi Space Star
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption5,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,0 lt
—Average consumption4,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FigoSpecificationMitsubishi Space Star
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
—TransmissionAutomatic
175/65 R14Tyre size15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FigoSpecificationMitsubishi Space Star
3995 mmLength3795 mm
1695 mmWidth1665 mm
1525 mmHeight1505 mm
—Weight865 kg
—Luggage capacity175 lt
2491 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Figo and 2016 Mitsubishi Space Star approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Figo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…