DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Explorer vs 2005 Nissan Armada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
ExplorerModelArmada
2004Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,3 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
5408 ccEngine displacement5552 cc
303 HPPower305 HP
495 NmTorque522 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank106 lt
—Urban consumption18,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,4 lt
—Average consumption15,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size265/70 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4813 mmLength5255 mm
1832 mmWidth2002 mm
1814 mmHeight1913 mm
1995 KgWeight2340 Kg
2890 mmWheelbase3130 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Explorer and 2005 Nissan Armada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…