DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Nissan Armada vs 2004 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeFord
ArmadaModelExplorer
2005Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5552 ccEngine displacement5408 cc
305 HPPower303 HP
522 NmTorque495 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
106 ltFuel tank85 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption—
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
15,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
265/70 R18Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

5255 mmLength4813 mm
2002 mmWidth1832 mm
1913 mmHeight1814 mm
2340 KgWeight1995 Kg
3130 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Nissan Armada and 2004 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…