DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Holden Commodore vs 1999 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.75–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeFord
CommodoreModelExplorer
1999Model year1999
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
0 km/hTop speed171 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
200 HPPower208 HP
304 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank83 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption18,2 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4884 mmLength4530 mm
1842 mmWidth1790 mm
1450 mmHeight1800 mm
1550 KgWeight1670 Kg
2788 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Holden Commodore and 1999 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…