DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Holden UTE vs 2003 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeFord
UTEModelExplorer
2003Model year2003
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed177 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3958 cc
200 HPPower160 HP
304 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank66 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size255/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4861 mmLength4536 mm
1794 mmWidth1783 mm
1448 mmHeight1714 mm
1450 KgWeight1807 Kg
2731 mmWheelbase2593 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Holden UTE and 2003 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…